Link copied to clipboard
.jpg)
When designing user onboarding for fintech products, especially family financial planning apps, the instinct is to simplify. Fewer steps, faster signup, better conversion. But what happens when "better UX" actually destroys trust?
Let me tell you about a client who did everything "right" and watched it backfire.
They had a 14-step signup flow for their family financial planning app. Users complained it was too long and confusing, full of financial jargon.
So they did the logical thing: cut it down to 4 steps and simplified the language. Cleaner. Faster. Better UX, right?
They tested it with 100 people.
Conversion dropped.
User interviews revealed why: "It doesn't feel trustworthy."
The issue wasn't the number of steps. It was the structure.
The original 14-step flow was poorly organized. It asked for tax documents before explaining the service, requested beneficiary details before establishing goals. It was built around backend requirements, not user psychology.
But when they shortened it, they removed the wrong friction. They stripped out steps that built confidence and helped parents feel understood. What remained felt superficial, like rushing families through major financial decisions.
For high-stakes products like family financial planning, this created a trust problem.
We separated "required to get started" from "required eventually."
Financial documents, beneficiary information, account linking. All necessary, but not upfront. First, let users understand the value. Then ask for sensitive details.
The psychology: Users need to trust you before they'll share sensitive financial information.
We restructured the flow around how families actually make financial decisions:
Understand what this is → See if it fits → Explore what's possible → Commit → Complete setup
This progression matches natural mental journeys, not just system requirements.
Instead of 14 overwhelming steps or 4 rushed ones, we created logical sections:
Each section had its own progress indicator, plus an overall progress bar.
The psychology: Breaking complex processes into chunks reduces cognitive overwhelm while maintaining thoroughness.
Parents don't complete financial planning in one sitting. They discuss with partners, look up information, and return when kids are asleep.
We auto-saved everything and made it easy to resume without starting over.
The redesigned onboarding flow felt substantial. Thorough enough to signal "we take your family's financial future seriously," but purposeful instead of tedious.
Each step had a clear reason. The progression made sense. And crucially, it matched the weight of the decision being made.
When designing for high-stakes decisions (fintech, health tech, family services), remember:
Too short feels irresponsible.
Too long feels disrespectful.
Disorganized feels incompetent.
The goal isn't fewer steps or more steps. It's purposeful steps that build trust while respecting real-life constraints.
Sometimes the best UX improvement isn't making things shorter or simpler. It's making them feel right for the decision at hand.
